Good Government Group Says “No” to CTA-opposed Special Exemptions Ballot Measure

Columnist Calls Prop. 32′s Real Purpose “To Cripple Unions Politically”

Los Angeles Times Columnist George Skelton

George Skelton, a highly respected and insightful political commentator for the Los Angeles Times, has turned his “de-cloaking” device onto Proposition 32, the Special Exemptions Act.   And what he’s turned up should help remove the blinders from anyone’s eyes.

In a column published October 17 and aptly titled, “Prop. 32′s Real Purpose is to Cripple Labor Unions Politically,” the long-serving Sacramento observer put it succinctly:

“Prop. 32′s real purpose is to cripple labor unions politically. It would do this by prohibiting unions from using payroll deductions for political purposes, with or without a worker’s permission.

“Corporations — and this is particularly deceptive — also would be covered by the ban. But they generally don’t raise political money with payroll deductions. They do it either by dipping into their corporate treasuries or by putting the squeeze on highly paid executives,” Skelton writes.

“As a solution to special-interest influence in politics, Prop. 32 is a self-serving sham,” Skelton concludes.

Read the entire article in the LA Times: George Skelton’s Oct. 17 Column on Prop. 32.

When is a Corporation Not a Corporation? According to Prop. 32, When It’s an LLC, LLP, REIT or Etc.

Susan DeCesare, a teacher in the Martinez Unified School District, and Anita Vanegas, a teacher in the Fremont Unified School District, discuss Proposition 32, the CTA-opposed Special Exemptions Act that will increase the power of wealthy special interests to get their way in the state Capitol.

As teachers in Northern California learned more about Proposition 32, the CTA-opposed Special Exemptions Act on the November 6 ballot, they were surprised to discover the double-wide loopholes that will allow a host of corporations to drive through.

Proposition 32 presumably regulates political contributions by “corporations,” but the proposition’s language uses technical terminology that exempts every business organization that is not “technically” a corporation, as defined in law, from its ban on using payroll deductions for political purposes.
Want a short list of the kinds of “non-corporation” corporations that are exempt from its provisions?  Here are just some – limited liability companies (LLCs, such as Amazon), limited liability partnerships (LLPs), limited partnerships (LPs), business trusts, real estate investment trusts (REITs), and sole proprietorships are intentionally exempted by the crafters of this misleading measure.
Did I mention that billionaires and Super PACs are also exempted?  They are.

Pundit: Special Interests Seek to “Unlevel” Political Playing Field in November

Sacramento Bee Columnist Jon Ortiz knows what billionaire political players and special interests had in mind when they put the Special Exemptions Act on the November 2012 ballot – gutting the political power of middle class working women and men and silencing their voices.

Ortiz reports that the measure pretends to level the political playing field, but it will in reality allow wealthy political contributors to skirt regulations and increase their political power. These wealthy interests already outspend labor by a ratio of 15-1.

“It promises to gut the power of labor unions because they raise nearly all of their money for political and other purposes via payroll-deducted dues from their members’ paychecks,” Ortiz writes. “Corporations, by contrast, raise the bulk of their campaign money from donations given by top executives and drawn from company treasuries.”

Read more about this deceptive and cynical power play in the Sacramento Bee’s  Move  Over Wisconsin.

 

Good Government Group Says “No” to CTA-opposed Special Exemptions Ballot Measure

California Common Cause, the nonpartisan good government group, has announced its
opposition to the CTA-opposed measure on the November ballot that would provide
exemptions from political funding regulations for corporate special interests.

Declares Common Cause: the initiative “effectively bans the current practice of payroll deductions, thus eliminating a major funding source of labor unions, while leaving ample room for indirect political spending by corporations from their corporate treasuries. This initiative would result in significant undue advantages for one set of interests over another that we believe will do more harm to California’s democracy than good, and we urge voters to vote ‘No.’”

For more information about Common Cause and its opposition to the initiative, click Common
Cause
.